“There was some pre-course work to download and consider. This was useful as, inevitably, there were some areas that were of more interest to me than others. It was important to understand whether what we were doing was right or wrong, and where there might be deviations from a recognised framework.
“It was a morning course, so I booked a quiet room on site and logged on a few minutes early, just to make sure that everything was fine. The trainer, Matthew Laskaj, welcomed us all as we joined and encouraged everyone to turn their camera on. That really helped to ensure everyone participated.
“There were seven other delegates, from completely different fields of engineering to mine. Their business backgrounds were very different, too. That was useful because it stimulated a group discussion about how people were doing things differently and the various stages of progress we were all at. We had an interesting open discussion as to how we interpreted the role of maintenance planning and what we thought that meant for our business. The size of the group made it more personal and we all had a chance to speak.
“Matthew took us through his slides but it was more interactive than that sounds. He talked about the slide content and then he would pose questions to each attendee. Sometimes people would volunteer to speak, at other times Matthew would ask someone how a particular topic applied to them or how they interpreted it.
“It was very well prepared – there was a clear structure but at the same time it was informal. Matthew covered everything I needed, but allowed time for questions, for him to propose ideas and to discuss attendees’ feedback.”