Women in Engineering

Women have made extraordinary contributions to engineering over the past century, and yet they are relatively poorly represented in the engineering profession. A new policy statement from the Institution looks at how Government, schools and employers can redress this balance. We also consider prestigious awards for women in engineering which are rewarding excellence.

Institution’s Education Policy Statement: Gender in Engineering

The UK Government actively encourages working populations to reflect the prevailing diversity of the country’s population. Legislation exists for each of the equality strands of race, gender, disability, sexual orientation, religion/belief and age. However, despite this, minority groups and women are relatively poorly represented in the engineering profession.

The contribution of women to engineering is not a new topic for discussion: the Women’s Engineering Society was established in 1919. There are, of course, many different perspectives on the subject. Perhaps the most commonly cited reasons for why there should be more equal representation between men and women in engineering are: human rights and natural justice; to help engineering better reflect the needs and interests of both sexes; and to provide a greater talent pool.

The Institution has identified some of the barriers to the participation of women in engineering, including the way that sciences are taught at school, college or university, and the dominant practice in the engineering profession. To overcome these barriers, the Institution offers the following recommendations:

The Department for Children Schools and Families (DCSF) should:

  • Review science curricula (particularly physics) at GCSE and at A Level to ensure they better reflect the interests of both boys and girls
  • Promote the potential of the 14–19 Engineering Diploma to appeal as much to girls as to boys
  • Support new inclusive approaches to teaching; engineering employers involved in the Engineering Diploma should ensure they provide opportunities that appeal to both boys and girls

Schools should:

  • Ensure that teaching of science and engineering subjects includes positive references to the subjects in a human context as well as in the technological context

Engineering employers should:

  • Prioritise the release of female engineers to support engineering engagement and enrichment schemes so that both boys and girls see female engineers as positive role models
  • Actively pursue greater flexibility in employment practice, particularly in the provision of career breaks and associated systems to facilitate re-entry to work through, for example, re-entry training
  • Be seen to be (as well as actually being) attractive to and genuinely welcoming of all who have the aptitude and aspiration to achieve –this may demand further changes in attitude and working practice within engineering premises

Read the full report


Women’s Engineering Society Karen Burt Memorial Award

The Women’s Engineering Society is taking proactive steps to encourage women to aim for Chartered Engineer and corporate status. Their Karen Burt Memorial Award, which was established in 1998, is presented annually to the most outstanding newly chartered female engineer of their year, nominated by their Institution.

Karen Burt was a tireless campaigner for the recruitment and retention of women in science and engineering. From her own experience and her extensive research she was regarded as an expert in the management of career breaks and women 'returners' to engineering.

A Cambridge graduate and holder of a PhD from Reading University, Karen started her working life at British Aerospace Systems at Stevenage as project engineer for scientific satellites and progressed to Senior Systems Engineer before developing an interest in management. She subsequently left the company to start up her own consultancy and was largely responsible for establishing the Centre for Advanced Instrumentation Systems within University College London (UCL). She had just accepted a position on the staff there when her career was tragically ended by a devastating stroke.

Given Karen’s own significant achievement in engineering and her passionate encouragement of female engineers, it is entirely fitting that the award established in her memory not only recognizes a nominee’s excellence and potential in the practice of engineering and highlights the importance of Chartered status, but also gives recognition to contributions made by the candidate to the promotion of the engineering profession.

Rhona Malcolm, the Young Member Board representative for the Construction and Building Services Division, is the Institution’s nomination for this year’s award, and we wish her well in the final selection process.

For more information on the Karen Burt Memorial Award


The Ford WISE Prize 2009

The Institution also rewards female engineering excellence through its support of the Ford WISE Prize. Aimed at penultimate year students on UK engineering courses and engineering apprentices, and sponsored by the Ford Motor Company and WISE (Women Into Science, Engineering and Construction), the prize recognises outstanding commitment and achievement by female undergraduates in all disciplines of engineering. It has been introduced to encourage and promote the potential of engineering careers to women.

Applications for the award are invited from any penultimate year female undergraduate studying engineering at a UK university or college, or an engineering apprentice - no age or nationality restrictions apply. The winner of the Ford WISE Prize will be active and committed to the world of engineering. She will not only study the discipline but will also demonstrate that she is dedicated and enthusiastic about being an engineer, with a sound understanding of the social significance of her activities. The winner will receive a certificate and a cheque for £1,000 as recognition of her commitment to engineering.

You can nominate yourself or be nominated by someone else (e.g. a tutor or an industry placement mentor).

For further details and to apply for the Ford Wise Prize 2009

The closing date for applications is Monday 20 July 2009.

Have your say

6 comments from readers

J Payne

25 June 2009 at 09.08

I would like to offer my comments on the perception that girls do not opt to study science at school because of the masculine course content. In my experience, the vast majority of female engineers come from single sex schools. This is because they encourage girls to study the sciences because the labs and staff are there to be used. This attitude overcomes the gender split between arts and sciences where, unless they make a conscious decision, girls will tend to drift towards the arts.

In mixed schools, where the places in science classes are predominately filled by boys, teachers will tend not to encourage girls to apply. To address this issue, I think that effort should be put into informing school girls of the opportunites open to them if they take science GCSE's and A levels. This will enable them to make a more informed decision.

Dr Helen Meese

25 June 2009 at 19.18

I have to disagree with J Payne's general comments on girls from single sex schools having a greater opportunity to study sciences due to reduced pressure in the class room from their male counterparts.

I went to a mixed school and was the only girl in my A-level year both studying sciences and wanting to be an engineer. Even though that was the case I never once felt that my desire to do sciences was over-shadowed by the boys in the class, indeed it made me work harder. I also had wonderful support from my maths and physics teachers who worked hard to help me achieve my goals.

I know my experience my be a rare one, even today, but i dont think it is limited to just mixed education. I do agree however that female engineers need to have a greater public image, and not still be seen as a novelty. I am pleased the IMechE are making a concerted effort to address this problem.

Ian Booker

25 June 2009 at 21.13

May I enquire as to who gave anyone the mandate to socially engineer a 50/50 split of man/women in any career?

I have worked with many women engineers in my career and found them to be excellent. Not one of them supported favourtism or special consideration because of their gender, they just wanted to be an Engineer.

I suggest that we promote engineering as an exciting and rewarding career (which it is!) to all young people but to single particular groups out for preferential treatment just to meet politically inspired targets is not what we need.

We could start by redesigning the interior of Birdcage Walk to reflect the modern world of engineering. I am sure George Stephenson who was at the cutting edge of engineering when he founded the IMechE would be disappointed to find that upon walking though the front door he found himself back in the 19th century!

M Loyley

26 June 2009 at 09.07

As much as it would be great to see more female engineers in the workplace, I don't feel that changing the curriculum to suit is the answer. Most people tend towards the subjects they enjoy and wish to study them further. The vast majority of the people I went to school with opted out of studying STEM subjects as soon as they could as they did not enjoy the subjects. I seriously doubt that even with a change in the way physics and mathematics are taught in schools this would have encouraged them to go on to be more science involved.

However I benefitted greatly from attending a WISE organised event between my GCSEs and A-Levels that probably helped get me to where I am today. More children should be encouraged to try these kind of things and getting more engineering companies involved should prove fruitful in years to come.

V Murthy

26 June 2009 at 11.17

I am a female engineer myself and i think the reason a lot of women arent interested in engineering is because of the overemphasis of the technical side and the little or no empahsis on the human side of engineering. I myself struggle to maintain interest when things get overly technical but at the end of the day, engineering is about making life better by humans for humans.

Also, a more humanistic way of thinking, which is often sneered at by older engineers, can actually produce valuable new ideas and a better understanding of needs. So what would interest and attract young people (not just women) is to present the whole subject in a much more interesting light and show how it affects them in their day to day lives.

Cathy Hunsley

29 June 2009 at 14.15

While it is gratifying to see that the Institution is finally waking up to the experience that women can bring to engineering, I feel that they should put their own house in order first.

I have been a member of an IMechE committee/group for almost 25 years, visiting Birdcage Walk for meetings every quarter. More often than not I get offered a Visitors' badge, whereas men by default are offered a Members' badge. Hardly the way to welcome female engineers.

And don't start me on the Institution's selections of ties or the female toilets somewhere in the depths of the building!

Post your comment

Please note that comments are moderated before being displayed on the website.

Proceed to the comment form.